Opinions Digested in Delaware Law Weekly for the Issue of
  October 24th, 2007

 


U.S. DISTRICT COURT OF DELAWARE

BANKRUPTCY

Preference Claims l Fraudulent Transfer Claims l Pleading l Notice

In re Student Finance Corp. DeFAX Case No. D63015 (D.Del. Oct. 5, 2007).

Defendants were entitled to have certain of the trustee’s preference and fraudulent transfer claims stricken because the trustee failed to plead these claims in a manner sufficient to give defendants fair notice. Motion to strike improper damage claims granted.
 

CIVIL PRACTICE

Jurisdiction l Personal Jurisdiction l Lebanese Joint Stock Company

URS Corp. v. Lebanese Co. for the Development & Reconstruction of Beirut Central Dist. SAL DeFAX Case No. D63016 (D.Del. Sept. 28, 2007).

Defendant, a Lebanese joint stock company, was entitled to dismissal of plaintiff’s Delaware action challenging its inclusion in a foreign arbitration proceeding because the federal court in Delaware lacked personal jurisdiction over defendant. Motion to dismiss granted in part, denied in part.
 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Patents l Infringement l Consolidation of Cases l Stay

Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. v. DexCom, Inc. DeFAX Case No. D63014 (D.Del. Sept. 30, 2007).

In this dispute over the alleged infringement of seven patents, defendant was entitled to have a newly filed case consolidated with a prior action and to have the proceedings stayed pending the Patent and Trademark Office’s reexamination of all seven patents-in-suit. Motions decided.
 


DELAWARE SUPREME COURT

FAMILY LAW

Visitation l Hearing l Mother’s Absence l Due Process

Taylor v. Taylor DeFAX Case No. D63013 (Del. Supr. Oct. 5, 2007).

The Family Court did not violate mother’s due process rights by conducting a hearing in mother’s absence, where mother absented herself from the proceedings and where the court made efforts to assist mother in presenting live testimony via videophone. Affirmed.
 


DELAWARE SUPERIOR COURT

CIVIL PRACTICE

Trial Administration l Motion for Reargument l Final Mortgage Foreclosure Action l Prior Litigation Fees and Costs l Disallowance

Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. v. Johnson DeFAX Case No. D63010 (Del. Super. Sept. 25, 2007).

Because the court has an active role in mortgage foreclosure actions and because the equitable authority given the court permits it to control its own process, the court had broad jurisdiction to disallow prior foreclosure litigation fees and costs. Motion for reargument denied.
 

TORTS

Premises Liability l Slip-and-Fall Accident l Proximate Cause l Jury Question

McFadden v. Delaware Racing Ass’n DeFAX Case No. D63009 (Del. Super. Sept. 13, 2006).

Plaintiff was not entitled to a new trial on the basis of a question asking the jury to determine whether defendant’s negligence was a proximate cause of plaintiff’s injury, rather than of her fall. Motion for new trial denied.
 


INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT BOARD

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

Impairment l Permanent Impairment l 19 Del. C. § 2321 l Three-Day Rule

Sandoval v. First State Plastics DeFAX Case No. D63012 (IAB Sept. 7, 2007).

Where it was highly unlikely that the Spanish-speaking claimant could read his doctor’s English-language disability note and where the employer was aware of that note and its opinion that claimant was medically disabled and should not work a certain number of days, employer was not entitled to dismissal of claimant’s permanent impairment petition for failure to comply with the three-day rule set forth at 19 Del. C. § 2321. Motion to dismiss petition denied.
 

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

Termination of Benefits l Evidence l Sole Medical Expert

Esquivel v. Barley Mill Realty DeFAX Case No. D63011 (IAB Sept. 10, 2007).

Claimant was no longer entitled to partial disability benefits where the Industrial Accident Board accepted the testimony of the sole medical expert who opined that claimant was capable of returning to work. Petition to terminate benefits granted.