A company’s status as an intended third-party beneficiary of a settlement agreement means that it can’t get out of a provision in which Delaware jurisdiction was specifically selected, a federal judge in the District of Delaware has ruled.
U.S. District Judge Sue L. Robinson’s decision means that a dispute over plates used for printing labels must be litigated in Delaware because a jurisdictional agreement worked out between E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. and a litigant would apply to MacDermid Printing Solutions LLC as a third-party beneficiary.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]