Public defenders arguing the unconstitutionality of Delaware’s death-penalty statute pushed back Monday against the Department of Justice’s argument in favor of its validity, calling its understanding of a controlling U.S. Supreme Court decision “faulty and incomplete.”
In their 25-page reply brief, the attorneys for convicted murderer Benjamin Rauf knocked the DOJ for “selectively citing narrow language” from the Supreme Court’s January ruling in Hurst v. Florida, which struck down that state’s law as unconstitutional because it allowed a judge to independently find the existence of aggravating factors in sentencing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]