In Rejecting Opinion of Treating Doctor, ALJ Must Say Why

, Delaware Law Weekly


If an administrative law judge fails to give the treating physician's opinion controlling weight in a disability hearing, they must explain why the analysis was rejected, the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware has ruled. The federal court's decision remanded a military veteran's denied disability claim back to the administrative law judge, or ALJ, to explain how much deference the treating physician's opinion should have received.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Legaltech News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202667186820

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.