Judges Probe Jury Charge on Defects in 'Tincher' Remand
An attorney representing plaintiffs in a case that has become synonymous with a new era of products liability law in Pennsylvania argued before a panel of the state Superior Court on Tuesday that juries do not need to find that a product was unreasonably dangerous in order to determine that the product was defective. But at least one judge on the intermediate appellate court appeared to disagree.
This premium content is reserved for Delaware Law Weekly subscribers.
Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.
Already a subscriber? Log in now