The state Superior Court has ruled that E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. cannot gain access to the payment terms of its opponent’s litigation funding agreement with a third party in a suit surrounding the alleged disclosure of confidential technology.
Superior Court President Judge Jan R. Jurden ruled in response to DuPont’s champerty and maintenance claims against plaintiff Charge Injection Technologies (CIT) that portions of CIT’s payment terms with Aloe Investments were protected by the state’s work-product doctrine.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]