• U.S. District Court of Delaware
  • D66272
  • Apr 17 2014 (Date Decided)
An individual energy customer did not have standing to challenge amendments to a law pertaining to energy suppliers, but a competing supplier who alleged future competitive injury did have standing on a dormant commerce clause challenge and its claim was ripe for review. Motion to dismiss granted in part, denied in part.

This premium content is reserved for Delaware Law Weekly subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now