State v. Elliott, DeFAX Case No. D66381 (C.P. Kent April 1, 2014) Reigle, J. (7 pages). July 16, 2014 | 0 Comments | SEE FULL TEXT OPINION share share on linkedin Facebook share on twitter share on google+ Share With Email Send Thank you for sharing! Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided. print reprints Courts of Common Pleas The results of defendant's Intoxilyzer test were admissible because the officer had sufficient "probable cause" under the "totality of the circumstances" test to seize defendant for driving under the influence of alcohol. VIEW COMMENTS ( 0 ) ADD COMMENT What's being said Sign In Terms & Conditions Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here. Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202663292832 Send Thank you! This article's comments will be reviewed.